
Key: |
QB-678
|
Type: |
Improvement
|
Status: |
Resolved
|
Resolution: |
Fixed
|
Priority: |
Major
|
Assignee: |
Unassigned
|
Reporter: |
Roger Perkins
|
Votes: |
0
|
Watchers: |
0
|
If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
|
|
|
QuickBuild
Created: 13/Oct/10 11:50 AM
Updated: 14/Oct/10 02:24 PM
|
|
Component/s: |
None
|
Affects Version/s: |
3.0.12
|
Fix Version/s: |
3.0.13
|
|
Original Estimate:
|
Unknown
|
Remaining Estimate:
|
Unknown
|
Time Spent:
|
Unknown
|
File Attachments:
|
None
|
Image Attachments:
|
|
|
In QB 2.x the step status and editing view used to be scaled to fit in a nice sensible width that would fit on my monitor. It did mean some items had their text wrap, but that was a small price to pay for being able to see what's going on.
In QB 3.x I'm now faced with a view that is always 2.5x wider than my monitor (with 8 steps running in parallel) resulting in having to scroll backwards and forwards to ensure things are building correctly and to see the overall status.
Can we go back to the narrow version or at least have an option to have the narrow version too?
I've attached images showing the old and new versions of the same steps. In the extra wide version some space could be reclaimed if children didn't need to redisplay the name of the step they were running on if it was the same as the parent.
|
Description
|
In QB 2.x the step status and editing view used to be scaled to fit in a nice sensible width that would fit on my monitor. It did mean some items had their text wrap, but that was a small price to pay for being able to see what's going on.
In QB 3.x I'm now faced with a view that is always 2.5x wider than my monitor (with 8 steps running in parallel) resulting in having to scroll backwards and forwards to ensure things are building correctly and to see the overall status.
Can we go back to the narrow version or at least have an option to have the narrow version too?
I've attached images showing the old and new versions of the same steps. In the extra wide version some space could be reclaimed if children didn't need to redisplay the name of the step they were running on if it was the same as the parent. |
Show » |
There are no comments yet on this issue.
|
|