
Key: |
QB-518
|
Type: |
Improvement
|
Status: |
Resolved
|
Resolution: |
Fixed
|
Priority: |
Minor
|
Assignee: |
Steve Luo
|
Reporter: |
Roger Perkins
|
Votes: |
0
|
Watchers: |
0
|
If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
|
|
|
QuickBuild
Created: 29/Jan/10 06:33 AM
Updated: 05/Feb/10 04:58 PM
|
|
Component/s: |
None
|
Affects Version/s: |
None
|
Fix Version/s: |
None
|
|
Original Estimate:
|
Unknown
|
Remaining Estimate:
|
Unknown
|
Time Spent:
|
Unknown
|
File Attachments:
|
None
|
Image Attachments:
|
|
|
When looking at the success rate or duration statistics for builds by day/month, if no builds occured for a certain day/month the success rate is shown at 0% for success and <1mil for durations. Could days/months where no builds have been done be skipped instead so that a direct line is drawn between the two surrounding days where builds actually occured? As it currently stands when looking at the success rate it's hard to tell bad build days from say weekends where no builds occured.
|
Description
|
When looking at the success rate or duration statistics for builds by day/month, if no builds occured for a certain day/month the success rate is shown at 0% for success and <1mil for durations. Could days/months where no builds have been done be skipped instead so that a direct line is drawn between the two surrounding days where builds actually occured? As it currently stands when looking at the success rate it's hard to tell bad build days from say weekends where no builds occured. |
Show » |
No work has yet been logged on this issue.
|
|