<< Back to previous view |
![]() |
[QB-500] Ant specific JUnit code can lead to failing pseudo tests that cause subsequent problems in test history tracking
|
|
Status: | Resolved |
Project: | QuickBuild |
Component/s: | None |
Affects Version/s: | None |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Bug | Priority: | Critical |
Reporter: | AlSt | Assigned To: | Steve Luo |
Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
Remaining Estimate: | Unknown | Time Spent: | Unknown |
Original Estimate: | Unknown | ||
Environment: | Ant + JUnit |
File Attachments: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Description |
Note: I have submitted an unexpected exception before (cf. attached screenshot #4) -- please ignore that and focus instead on this one.
"BeforeFirstTest" stems from Ant: see http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/200607.mbox/%3C20060708211941.792401A981A@eris.apache.org%3E ... } else if (args[i].startsWith("crashfile=")) { + crashFile = args[i].substring(12); + registerTestCase("BeforeFirstTest"); ... And presumably the JVM of the JUnit test execution crashed once before, e.g. leading to this error message: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Forked Java VM exited abnormally. Please note the time in the report does not reflect the time until the VM exit. |
Comments |
Comment by AlSt [ 13/Jan/10 08:55 AM ] |
From qb20\storage\builds\136040\reports\junit\DEFAULT: this shows why I think it is a test history problem |
Comment by AlSt [ 13/Jan/10 09:23 AM ] |
Note: After the next run this problem has gone again -- most likely because the history/trend is only shown between two consecutive builds.
=> Thus, I would say the priority of this issue should be lower, i.e. normal. |