Comment by
Robin Shen
[
29/Jun/16 01:00 AM
]
|
In advanced setting of the root configuration you may change workspace setting to use specified workspace path as below:
${node.hasAttribute("workspaceRoot")?node.getAttribute("workspaceRoot")+"/"+configuration.pathName: system.getWorkspaceDir().absolutePath + "/" + configuration.pathName}
Then you can define workspaceRoot attribute for the node you want to override the default workspace root.
|
Comment by
J. Mash
[
23/Jul/16 12:09 AM
]
|
This is essentially what we are doing as a workaround, however... It feels quite wrong to have to resort to this as a means of configuring the location of QuickBuild's workspace directory for all configurations for all products. This seems very much an application-level setting that should live in the application's configuration file(s).
Consider it similar in nature and scope to being able to specify where QuickBuild's "logs" directory lives, or the "storage" directory.
|
Comment by
Robin Shen
[
23/Jul/16 03:57 PM
]
|
I understand this is a workaround, but we do not want to get QB setting page piled with possible options and settings for different scenarios. We try to keep simple things easy while make complex things possible.
|
Comment by
J. Mash
[
23/Jul/16 04:43 PM
]
|
This really has little to do with the settings page at all, as it would be a node-specific setting that lives in the 'node.properties' file. I really don't understand the resistance here, as it's completely hidden for those who don't care about it, and exists for those who need it.
|
Comment by
Robin Shen
[
24/Jul/16 01:32 AM
]
|
Simply adding a "workspaceRoot" property to the node.properties does not do the work at all, as user may have deleted/renamed that unintentionally if it is mixed with other properties. So it should be handled in a different way from other properties, and this means you have to add extra setting at node level to complicate things for most users not using that at all.
|
Comment by
J. Mash
[
03/Aug/16 06:27 PM
]
|
I wholly disagree and fail to see how adding an optional configuration property that defaults to the existing behavior complicates anything for most users. If the default behavior doesn't change, most users will never even notice anyway. I also challenge the perception that this is something "most users" wouldn't use, simply due to this feature's prevalence in just about every other CI/CD tool available, with Jenkins/Hudson being the classic and most prominent example.
|
Generated at Sun Oct 05 21:28:25 UTC 2025 using JIRA 189.