
| Key: |
QB-1824
|
| Type: |
Improvement
|
| Status: |
Resolved
|
| Resolution: |
Fixed
|
| Priority: |
Major
|
| Assignee: |
Unassigned
|
| Reporter: |
productivity
|
| Votes: |
0
|
| Watchers: |
0
|
|
If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
|
|
|
|
Original Estimate:
|
Unknown
|
Remaining Estimate:
|
Unknown
|
Time Spent:
|
Unknown
|
|
Currently, the behavior of the "Shell/Batch command" is different when executing a single command line (which AFAIK, uses the Java ProcessBuilder) than when executing multiple line commands (which actually creates a temporary batch or shell file that is interpreted directly by the console/terminal). I believe that in both cases, the behavior should be the same and they should both create a temporary batch/shell file for interpretation by the shell.
See http://forum.pmease.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2876 for more details and for an example of the kind of problem this issue can bring.
|
|
Description
|
Currently, the behavior of the "Shell/Batch command" is different when executing a single command line (which AFAIK, uses the Java ProcessBuilder) than when executing multiple line commands (which actually creates a temporary batch or shell file that is interpreted directly by the console/terminal). I believe that in both cases, the behavior should be the same and they should both create a temporary batch/shell file for interpretation by the shell.
See http://forum.pmease.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2876 for more details and for an example of the kind of problem this issue can bring. |
Show » |
| No work has yet been logged on this issue.
|
|