| << Back to previous view |
|
[QB-3294] Problem with bitbucket server repository
|
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | QuickBuild |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | 7.0.28 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Norbert | Assigned To: | Robin Shen |
| Resolution: | Duplicate | Votes: | 0 |
| Remaining Estimate: | Unknown | Time Spent: | Unknown |
| Original Estimate: | Unknown | ||
| Environment: | Linux 4.4.0-116-generic, amd64 | ||
| File Attachments: |
Screenshot 2018-11-21 10.17.51.png
|
| Description |
|
I have pipeline configured with git repository and one of my step is triggering other builds. Everything is working fine, but I want to use bitbucket integration. When I change my repository to bitbucket server (and this is my only change) I've got error on executing external pipeline step: Build is too old to be requested.
Builds are triggered and finished successfully, however this error is causing entire pipeline fail, and in BitBucket I also see build as failed. What can be a problem? |
| Comments |
| Comment by Robin Shen [ 15/Nov/18 11:57 PM ] |
| The first build after changing the repository type might fail. How about triggering the build again? Is it failing all the time? |
| Comment by Norbert [ 16/Nov/18 02:11 PM ] |
|
Hello Robin,
Yes, i've tried to re-run my pipeline and it fails in exactly same way. After few minutes, when steps that should trigger other builds is started, it is failing with exactly same error. |
| Comment by Robin Shen [ 16/Nov/18 11:29 PM ] |
| Do you have logic deleting the triggered/triggering build? This normally happens when a build is deleted soon after it is triggered. |
| Comment by Norbert [ 21/Nov/18 09:26 AM ] |
| Not really - I am not deleting anything there... |
| Comment by Robin Shen [ 21/Nov/18 11:54 PM ] |
| Are you able to reproduce this issue with a sample setup? |
| Comment by Norbert [ 27/Nov/18 12:21 PM ] |
|
Hello Robin.
I tested it on other builds and here is what I noticed: - If I have option "Build Open Pull Requests" ENABLED - it fails - If I have option "Build Open Pull Requests" DISABLED - it is working fine (external builds are triggered) - If I won't trigger external build it works fine (with "Build Open Pull Requests" ENABLED) |
| Comment by Robin Shen [ 28/Nov/18 12:16 AM ] |
|
I am trying to reproduce your scenario, and it works fine. Here is what I am doing:
1. Create a test configuration "root/test", with two children "root/test/child1" and "root/test/child2" 2. Define a BitBucket server repository in "root/test" with build open pull request option enabled 3. Create a checkout step in "root/test" to checkout the repository 4. Add a step of type "trigger other builds" in "root/test" with "configuration path" specified as ${params.get("child")}, and define a repeat param with name "child", and value "root/test/child1, root/test/child2" 5. Edit master step of "root/test/child1" and "root/test/child2" to do simple things such as echo a message Now if I run the "root/test" configuration, all open pull requests are built and the child configurations are triggered fine. Do you have any specific logic in your build definition? |
| Comment by Norbert [ 28/Nov/18 02:02 PM ] |
|
Robin,
I think I found problem: I have checkout (the same) repository in all builds that are triggered and inherited repository setup. So simple configuration to reproduce my problem is: 1. Create a test configuration "root/test", with two children "root/test/child1" and "root/test/child2" 2. Define a BitBucket server repository in "root/test" with build open pull request option enabled (make sure it is inherited by children) 3. Create checkout step in ALL configs ( "root/test", "root/test/child1", "root/test/child2") 4. Create Parallel step to run external builds in parallel. 5. Create trigger other builds and execute "root/test/child1" and "root/test/child2" If I disable build open pull request option on children, it works fine. Is this correct behaviour? However I have one more additional question regards BitBucket integration: If I make fork of my repository, make change on it and then create Pull Request back to my repository, QB can see it (build is triggered) but it is building master branch on my repository (without my changes). Is this correct behaviour? |
| Comment by Robin Shen [ 29/Nov/18 12:07 AM ] |
|
Yes I can reproduce this issue if triggered build also builds against pull requests. Also if pull request is created between two different repositories, it will build target branch of target repository. We will investigate and try to fix these two issues in QB9.
PS: the bitbucket server plugin is contributed by other customers, and it may lack some features... |
| Comment by Robin Shen [ 17/Jan/19 03:01 PM ] |
|
Split this issue into |